|
This Question and Answer information
packet supplements the ADA Compliance Kit distributed by the NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® in January 1992 and covers the most
frequently asked questions from REALTORS® in relation to the
ADA. (Prepared by the Legal Affairs Department of the NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®, November, 1992).
TITLE I - Employment
Question #1: Does Title I cover independent contractors and apply
if a real estate office has 15 independent contractors rather than
employees?
Answer: Title I covers employees, although the Office on the ADA
has indicated that whether an individual is an employee or independent
contractor will be carefully evaluated under federal law. For real
estate brokers, that means that the broker/agent relationship will be
scrutinized to determine whether an independent contractor relationship
actually exists or whether agents are treated as employees.
Question #2: If a real estate company has a number of branch
offices, are employees in each branch office counted separately or are
the numbers totaled to reach the threshold number for Title I?
Answer: The numbers are totaled (example: three branch offices
with 5 employees at each location total 15 employees). Since the
threshold number of 15 has been exceeded, Title I applies.
TITLE III
Public Accommodations, Commercial Facilities and Private Entities
that Offer Certain Educational Courses.
Question #3: Can a place of public accommodation be covered by
both the ADA and the Fair Housing Act (FHA)?
Answer: Yes. The analysis for determining whether a facility is
covered by the ADA is entirely separate and independent from the
analysis used to determine coverage under the FHA. A facility can be a
residential dwelling under the FHA and still fall in whole or in part
under at least one of the 12 categories of places of public
accommodation.
Question #4: How does the "readily achievable" standard relate to
other standards in the ADA?
Answer: The ADA establishes different standards for existing
facilities versus alterations to existing facilities and new
construction. In existing facilities, where retrofitting may be
expensive, the requirement to provide access is less stringent than it
is in new construction and where alterations to existing facilities are
being made, where accessibility can be incorporated in the initial
stages of design and construction without a significant increase in
cost.
Question #5: How does a public accommodation determine when
barrier removal is readily achievable?
Answer: Determining if barrier removal is readily achievable is a
case-by-case decision. Factors to consider include:
1) The nature and cost;
2) The overall financial resources of the entity involved; the number
of persons employed at the site; the effect on expenses and resources;
legitimate safety requirements necessary for safe operation, including
crime prevention measures; or any other impact of the action on the
operation of the business;
3) The administrative or fiscal relationship of the business in
question to any parent corporation or entity;
4) If applicable, the overall financial resources of any parent
corporation or entity; the overall size of the parent corporation or
entity with respect to the number of its employees; the number, type,
and location of its facilities; and
5) If applicable, the type of operation of any parent corporation or
entity, including the composition, structure, and functions of the
workforce of the parent corporation or entity.
Question #6: Are public accommodations required to retrofit
existing buildings by adding elevators?
Answer: A public accommodation generally would not be required to
remove a barrier to physical access posed by a flight of steps, if
removal would require extensive ramping or an elevator. The readily
achievable standard does not require barrier removal that requires
extensive restructuring or burdensome expense. Thus, where it is not
readily achievable to do, the ADA would not require a public
accommodation to provide access to an area reachable only by a flight of
stairs.
Question #7: Does the ADA require barrier removal in historical
buildings?
Answer: Yes, if it is readily achievable. However, the ADA takes
into account the national interest in preserving significant historic
structures. Barrier removal would not be considered "readily achievable"
if it would threaten or destroy the historic significance of a building
or facility that is eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places under the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C.
470, et seq.), or is designated as historic under State or local law.
Question #8: Are portable ramps permitted?
Answer: Yes, but only when the installation of a permanent ramp
is not readily achievable. In order to promote safety, a portable ramp
should have railings and a firm, stable, nonslip surface. It should also
be properly secured.
Question #9: If a public accommodation determines that its
facilities have barriers that should be removed, but it is not readily
achievable to undertake all of the modifications now, what should it do?
Answer: The Office on the ADA recommends that a public
accommodation develop an implementation plan designed to achieve
compliance with the ADA's barrier removal requirements. Such a plan, if
appropriately designed and diligently executed, could serve as evidence
of a good faith effort to comply with the ADA's barrier removal
requirements.
Question #10: Must a real estate agent who uses his/her home (or
a portion thereof) as an office, comply with Title III?
Answer: Yes. If a private residence (or a portion thereof) is
used for business purposes and clients/customers frequent that location,
Title III applies to those areas used for business purposes even if
they're also used for residential purposes. The entrance to the office
must also be accessible such as the sidewalk, door, and entryway.
Question #11: Are model homes and open houses places of public
accommodation?
Answer: Generally, no. Model homes and open houses do not fall
under the 12 categories of places of public accommodation. If, however,
the sales office for a residential housing development is located in a
model home, the area used for the sales office would be considered a
place of public accommodation. Although model homes are not covered, the
Office on the ADA encourages developers to voluntarily provide at least
a minimal level of access to model homes for potential homebuyers with
disabilities. For example, a developer could provide physical access
(via ramp or lift) to the primary level of one of several model homes
and make photographs of other levels of the home as well as of other
models available to the customer.
Question #12: Do both a landlord who leases space in a building
to a tenant and the tenant who operates a place of public accommodation
have responsibilities under the ADA?
Answer: Both the landlord and the tenant are public
accommodations and have full responsibility for complying with all Title
III requirements applicable to places of public accommodation. The
landlord and tenant must allocate responsibility, in the lease, for
complying with particular provisions of the regulation. However, any
allocation made in a lease or other contract is only effective as
between the parties, and both landlord and tenant remain fully liable
for compliance with all provisions of the ADA relating to that place of
public accommodation.
Question #13: What if a tenant remodels his store in a manner
that would trigger the path of travel obligation, but the tenant has no
authority to create an accessible path of travel because the common
areas are under control of the landlord? Does this mean the landlord
must now make an accessible path of travel for the remodeled store?
Answer: No. Alterations by a tenant do not trigger a path of
travel obligation for the landlord. Nor is the tenant required to make
changes in areas not under his control.
Question #14: How do we determine if committee members or
registrants to our meetings and educational courses are disabled and
have special needs?
Answer: Ask! Add a question to your committee appointment letters
and all of your registration forms as follows:
Please check here if you have a disability which will require special
services at a (meeting/course). Attach a written description of your
needs.
And, include a notice in the registration packet (for on-site
registrants) asking those with disabilities who require special
accommodation to contact the Registration Desk.
Question #15:At our Convention, we're sponsoring certain tours and recreational activities.
Do they need to be accessible to the disabled?
Answer: Generally yes, if they can be made accessible. Since tour
company services are open to the public, tour companies are considered
public accommodations and may already have taken the steps necessary to
comply with the ADA. If they haven't, you may want to consider a
different company that is in compliance. In respect to recreational
activities, they should be made accessible to the disabled to the extent
it's readily achievable to do so.
Question #16: If we provide ground transportation to certain
social functions during our Convention, do we need to provide special
transportation for those in wheelchairs?
Answer: Yes.
Question #17: When auxiliary aids are to be provided, who decides
what type of auxiliary aids are acceptable?
Answer: Public accommodations should consult with individuals
with disabilities whenever possible to determine what type of auxiliary
aid is needed to ensure effective access and communication. In many
cases, more than one type of auxiliary aid or service may be acceptable.
While consultation is strongly encouraged, the ultimate decision as to
what measures to take to ensure compliance rests in the hands of the
public accommodation, provided that the method chosen results in
effective access and communication.
Question #18: Who is a qualified interpreter?
Answer: There are a number of sign language systems in use by
persons who use sign language. (The most common systems of sign language
are American Sign Language and signed English.) Individuals who use a
particular system may not communicate effectively through an interpreter
who uses another system. When an interpreter is required, the public
accommodation should provide a qualified interpreter, that is, an
interpreter who is able to sign to the individual who is deaf what is
being said by the hearing person and who can voice to the hearing person
what is being signed by the individual who is deaf. This communication
must be conveyed effectively, accurately, and impartially, through the
use of any necessary specialized vocabulary.
Question #19: Can a public accommodation use a staff member who
signs "pretty well" as an interpreter for meetings with individuals who
use sign language to communicate?
Answer: Signing and interpreting are not the same thing. Being
able to sign does not mean that a person can process spoken
communication into the proper signs, nor does it mean that he or she
possesses the proper skills to observe someone signing and change their
signed or finger spelled communication into spoken words. The
interpreter must be able to interpret both receptively and expressively.
Question #20: If a sign language interpreter is required for
effective communication, must only a certified interpreter be provided?
Answer: No. The key question in determining whether effective
communication will result is whether the interpreter is "qualified," not
whether he or she has been actually certified by an official licensing
body. A qualified interpreter is one "who is able to interpret
effectively, accurately and impartially, both receptively and
expressively, using any necessary specialized vocabulary." An individual
does not have to be certified in order to meet this standard. A
certified interpreter may not meet this standard in all situations,
e.g., where the interpreter is not familiar with the specialized
vocabulary involved in the communication at issue.
Question #21: What obligations does an examiner have if its
facilities are inaccessible?
Answer: Examinations must be administered in facilities that are
accessible to individuals with disabilities or alternative accessible
arrangements must be made. If the facility in which the examination is
offered is not accessible, it may be administered to an individual with
a disability in a different room or other location. For instance, the
entity might provide the examination at an individual's home with a
proctor. The alternative location must, however, provide comparable
conditions in which the test is administered to others.
Question #22: May an examiner require that an applicant provide
documentation of the existence and nature of the disability as evidence
that he or she is entitled to modifications or aids?
Answer: Yes, but requests for documentation must be reasonable
and must be limited to the need for the modification or aid requested.
Appropriate documentation might include a letter from a physician or
other professional, or evidence of a prior diagnosis or accommodation,
such as eligibility for a special education program. The applicant may
be required to bear the cost of providing such documentation, but the
entity administering the examination cannot charge the applicant for the
cost of any modifications or auxiliary aids, such as interpreters,
provided for the examination.
Question #23: If a public accommodation makes good faith efforts
to comply with the ADA, will that be considered in determining the
amount of a civil penalty if non-compliance is found to exist?
Answer: Yes. In considering what amount of civil penalty, if any,
is appropriate, the court is required to give consideration to any good
faith effort or attempt by the covered entity to comply with its
obligations under the ADA. One of the factors to be considered in
evaluating good faith is whether the entity could have reasonably
anticipated the need for an appropriate type of auxiliary aid needed to
accommodate the unique needs of a particular individual with a
disability.
|